Goddati Bharath Kumar vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — TRCRLP/44/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 407and447. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010155502026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2026
Filing Number
TRCRLP/3049/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
TRCRLP/44/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Coram
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Goddati Bharath Kumar
Adv. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Goddati Subhashini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
Court Decision Summary Justice V. Gopala Krishna Rao dismissed the transfer petition filed by Accused No. 1 seeking to transfer a murder case (Section 302 IPC) from Nellore to Tirupati. The court held that mere apprehension of bias without credible prima facie evidence cannot justify case transfer, and the accused's allegation that the investigating officer discussed the case with the judge for over an hour remained an unsubstantiated bald assertion. The court emphasized that transfer orders require substantial, compelling grounds showing real risk of injustice, not mere convenience or unproven suspicions of unfairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
30-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
24-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TRCRLP/44/2026
Court Decision Summary Justice V. Gopala Krishna Rao dismissed the transfer petition filed by Accused No. 1 seeking to transfer a murder case (Section 302 IPC) from Nellore to Tirupati. The court held that mere apprehension of bias without credible prima facie evidence cannot justify case transfer, and the accused's allegation that the investigating officer discussed the case with the judge for over an hour remained an unsubstantiated bald assertion. The court emphasized that transfer orders require substantial, compelling grounds showing real risk of injustice, not mere convenience or unproven suspicions of unfairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts