SRI SURADA NARASINGA RAO vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2390/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010155072026

Filing Number

CRLP/3039/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2390/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the P.R.C ( 143 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI SURADA NARASINGA RAO

    Adv. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU

  2. 2.Chinni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Sri Earla Venkata Tarakeswara Rao

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Petition No. 2390 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice before admission. The court directed notice to be issued to Respondent No. 2 (Sri Earla Venkata Tarakeswara Rao) to show cause within four weeks why the petition should not be admitted. The case has been posted for hearing after four weeks, with the petitioners' counsel permitted to serve personal notice on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2390/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Petition No. 2390 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice before admission. The court directed notice to be issued to Respondent No. 2 (Sri Earla Venkata Tarakeswara Rao) to show cause within four weeks why the petition should not be admitted. The case has been posted for hearing after four weeks, with the petitioners' counsel permitted to serve personal notice on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case