GURUNADHAM RAMESH vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2392/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010154492026

Filing Number

CRLP/3021/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2392/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURUNADHAM RAMESH

    Adv. KOPPARTHI SUMATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the bail petition of Gurunadham Ramesh, accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in the heinous crime and held that mere filing of the charge sheet does not automatically entitle an accused to bail, as the gravity of the offense and risk of witness tampering must be considered. The trial court was directed to expeditiously dispose of the case and report progress by May 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2392/2026

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the bail petition of Gurunadham Ramesh, accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in the heinous crime and held that mere filing of the charge sheet does not automatically entitle an accused to bail, as the gravity of the offense and risk of witness tampering must be considered. The trial court was directed to expeditiously dispose of the case and report progress by May 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case