Shaik Jaleel vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2351/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 02nd April 2026.
CNR: APHC010154232026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/3016/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2351/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Coram
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaik Jaleel
Adv. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted regular bail to Shaik Jaleel, who was accused of land fraud and forgery charges, finding that his earlier bail cancellation based solely on press statements made in anguish was insufficient grounds. The court imposed ten stringent conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, weekly police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, passport surrender, and a critical restriction against conducting press meets or making social media statements about the pending case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
For Orders
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
31-Mar-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
30-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2351/2026
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted regular bail to Shaik Jaleel, who was accused of land fraud and forgery charges, finding that his earlier bail cancellation based solely on press statements made in anguish was insufficient grounds. The court imposed ten stringent conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, weekly police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, passport surrender, and a critical restriction against conducting press meets or making social media statements about the pending case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts