VUYYALA KANAKA MAHA LAKSHMI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/8267/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010153992026
Filing Number
WP/12381/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8267/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Coram
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VUYYALA KANAKA MAHA LAKSHMI
Adv. SODUM ANVESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Superintendent of Police,
-
3.Sub-Divisional Police Officer,
-
4.The Superintendent of Police,
-
5.Sub-Divisional Police Officer.
-
6.Inspector of Police,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
31-Mar-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the Writ Petition (WP No. 8267 of 2026) for four weeks to allow the respondent authorities to file a counter-affidavit. Meanwhile, the court directed police authorities to follow the procedure established in a Division Bench order dated 12.09.2022 when summoning the petitioner regarding the pending suspect sheet, ensuring compliance with due process before calling her to the police station or visiting her residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission (Home)
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8267/2026
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the Writ Petition (WP No. 8267 of 2026) for four weeks to allow the respondent authorities to file a counter-affidavit. Meanwhile, the court directed police authorities to follow the procedure established in a Division Bench order dated 12.09.2022 when summoning the petitioner regarding the pending suspect sheet, ensuring compliance with due process before calling her to the police station or visiting her residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts