N. Vara Prasad vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II — WP/7960/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010147752026

Filing Number

WP/11865/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7960/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

D Ramesh

Coram

D Ramesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

APSRTC (MISC. MATTERS) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N. Vara Prasad

    Adv. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II

  2. 2.The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation,

  3. 3.The Executive Director,

  4. 4.The Depot Manager,

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

    Summary: The Andhra Pradesh High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP.No.7960 of 2026) for four weeks to allow the Government to file a counter-affidavit. The petitioner, N. Vara Prasad, sought a mandamus directing respondents to grant notional seniority from 13.07.2002 instead of 01.07.2009. Meanwhile, the court directed respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 14.11.2025 as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7960/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Andhra Pradesh High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP.No.7960 of 2026) for four weeks to allow the Government to file a counter-affidavit. The petitioner, N. Vara Prasad, sought a mandamus directing respondents to grant notional seniority from 13.07.2002 instead of 01.07.2009. Meanwhile, the court directed respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 14.11.2025 as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case