Jenu Venkateswar Rao, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/8210/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010147562026

Filing Number

WP/11848/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/8210/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jenu Venkateswar Rao,

    Adv. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Station House Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Case Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Jenu Venkateswar Rao, a 68-year-old petitioner, who sought to prevent police from summoning him to Kalla Police Station. The court held that since the police had not taken any further action on the PGRS complaint filed against the petitioner (as the inquiry period had lapsed), there was no legal justification for the police to call the petitioner to the station or interfere with his personal liberty, thereby granting the petitioner relief from further police interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Jenu Venkateswar Rao, a 68-year-old petitioner, who sought to prevent police from summoning him to Kalla Police Station. The court held that since the police had not taken any further action on the PGRS complaint filed against the petitioner (as the inquiry period had lapsed), there was no legal justification for the police to call the petitioner to the station or interfere with his personal liberty, thereby granting the petitioner relief from further police interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case