MOKAMATLA NAGA SITA RAMUDU vs THE STATE OF AP — WP/7713/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010141462026

Filing Number

WP/11352/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7713/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Nyapathy Vijay

Coram

Nyapathy Vijay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

FOOD & AGRL.MARKET COMMITTEE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOKAMATLA NAGA SITA RAMUDU

    Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR TADISETTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP

  2. 2.The District Fisheries Officer,

  3. 3.The Joint Director of Fisheries and Member Secretary,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar-cum-Chairman,

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  5. 5.The Fisheries Development

  6. 6.Smt. Kavala Lakshmi,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh modified its previous status quo order in two consolidated petitions involving aquaculture violations. The petitioner's license suspension for unauthorized shrimp culture was found prima facie valid since she admitted to the violation in her explanation. The Court restrained the petitioner from conducting any aquaculture or shrimp culture activities on the disputed land and adjourned both cases to 29.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7713/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh modified its previous status quo order in two consolidated petitions involving aquaculture violations. The petitioner's license suspension for unauthorized shrimp culture was found prima facie valid since she admitted to the violation in her explanation. The Court restrained the petitioner from conducting any aquaculture or shrimp culture activities on the disputed land and adjourned both cases to 29.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case