P. Venkata Rao, vs The State of A.P. Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP — WP/7816/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: APHC010139602026

Filing Number

WP/11191/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7816/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Coram

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Venkata Rao,

    Adv. DHARANI KUMAR B

  2. 2.Ananta Lakshmi Pilli,

  3. 3.Katragadda Lavanya,

  4. 4.Varanasi Govinda Rao,

  5. 5.Yerranagu Brahma Reddy,

  6. 6.Bhavireddy Prabhu Kumar,

  7. 7.Puligujju Krishna Rao,

  8. 8.Puligujju Durgamba,

  9. 9.Varanasi Ananth Manikanta,

  10. 10.AIuru Srinivasa Rao,

  11. 11.Shaik Sabira,

  12. 12.Reddy Veera Venkata Suresh,

  13. 13.Darapu Durga Naga Reddy,

  14. 14.Potnuru Anand,

  15. 15.Shaik Dada Vali,

  16. 16.Mahammad Abdulla Saheb,

  17. 17.Patan Shainaz,

  18. 18.Vunna Jayalakshmi,

  19. 19.Pathan Shamimuhn,

  20. 20.Thunuguntia Venkata Srinivasarao,

  21. 21.Thunuguntia Uma Maheswararao,

  22. 22.B.Rajasekhara Rao,

  23. 23.Potnuru Savithri,

  24. 24.Shaik Nymatunisa,

  25. 25.Shaik Mabhu Subhan Bi,

  26. 26.Viswanadhapalli Veerababu,

  27. 27.Surath Vijaya,

  28. 28.Surath Somaiah,

  29. 29.Korada Srinivasarao,

  30. 30.Podugu Satyanarayana,

  31. 31.Shaik Meeravali,

  32. 32.Shaik Nagoor,

  33. 33.Bhavireddy Vijayalakshmi,

  34. 34.Potnuru Ashok,

  35. 35.Shaik Jilani,

  36. 36.Shaik Mahammad Vali,

  37. 37.Doki Priya Darshini,

  38. 38.Loya Lima Maheswararao,

  39. 39.Chowdari Pragathi,

  40. 40.Narra Padma,

  41. 41.Naramsetty Chiranjeevi,

  42. 42.Surathu Nageswararao,

  43. 43.Padamata Narayanarao,

  44. 44.Matta Sankar Reddy,

  45. 45.Sunkara Chennakesava,

  46. 46.Tunuguntla Katyayani,

  47. 47.Rayi Suresh,

  48. 48.Vaddiboyina Suresh,

  49. 49.Sunkara Subbalakshmi,

  50. 50.Thota Sivasankara Rao,

  51. 51.Lakshman Sadhuram

  52. 52.Pothireddy Ravikumar Reddy,

  53. 53.Gujjula Ramasubbareddy

  54. 54.Badidaboyina Lakshmi,

  55. 55.The Vijayawada Urban Fancy Readymade and Old Cloth Merchants Association (Reg.No.70/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of A.P. Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Vijayawada Municipal Corporation,

    Adv. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC

  4. 4.The Assistant City Planner-II,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

    Adv. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Incomplete Matters

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh (WP 7816 of 2026) granted relief to street vendors by directing the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation to provide alternate sites for relocation before eviction. The court adjourned the case to 27.04.2026, allowing the petitioners to select from proposed alternate locations based on majority consensus among shopkeepers, recognizing that 100% agreement is impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Incomplete Matters

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7816/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh (WP 7816 of 2026) granted relief to street vendors by directing the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation to provide alternate sites for relocation before eviction. The court adjourned the case to 27.04.2026, allowing the petitioners to select from proposed alternate locations based on majority consensus among shopkeepers, recognizing that 100% agreement is impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case