GANGIREDDY VENKATARAMI REDDY vs THE STATE OF AP — WP/7216/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010136762026

Filing Number

WP/10958/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7216/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

APSEB (MISC.MATTERS) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGIREDDY VENKATARAMI REDDY

    Adv. Y MAHA LAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP

  2. 2.The Southern Power Distribution Company of A P Ltd

  3. 3.The Superintendent Engineer

    Adv. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL

  4. 4.The Assistant Engineer

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    For Orders

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Adjourned. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned W.P. No. 7216 of 2026 to 05.05.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The Court warned that no further adjournments will be entertained and will pass appropriate orders based on available record material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Admission (A P S E B)

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7216/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned W.P. No. 7216 of 2026 to 05.05.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The Court warned that no further adjournments will be entertained and will pass appropriate orders based on available record material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case