DASARI NAGABHUSANAM vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2185/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010131572026

Filing Number

CRLP/2630/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2185/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 BNSS Anticipatory Bail(CRL.4A-N) ( 148 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DASARI NAGABHUSANAM

    Adv. K KRANTI CHAITANYA

  2. 2.Mantripragada Jayasri, (A-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a land fraud case involving alleged manipulation of power of attorney documents and fraudulent property transfer. The court found the matter primarily emanated from civil disputes already pending in a suit and allowed bail with conditions including personal bond of Rs. 20,000 each, weekly police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a land fraud case involving alleged manipulation of power of attorney documents and fraudulent property transfer. The court found the matter primarily emanated from civil disputes already pending in a suit and allowed bail with conditions including personal bond of Rs. 20,000 each, weekly police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case