M/s. Sri Venkatrama Agro Tech, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLRC/220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010108852026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

CRLRC/2166/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLRC/220/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLRC ( 42 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Sri Venkatrama Agro Tech,

    Adv. KANITHI DEEPAK

  2. 2.Ch V V Padmakar Chowdary,

  3. 3.Cherukuri Ramarao,

  4. 4.Cherukuri Rani,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Union Bank of india (previously Andhra Bank),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a criminal revision case filed by Sri Venkatrama Agro Tech and others challenging the lower court's appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to record cross-examination of a witness (PW1). Though the petitioners objected to the application being filed under an incorrect legal provision, the court held that using the wrong provision alone is insufficient grounds for dismissal when the substantive relief—appointing an Advocate Commissioner—was properly exercised. The court upheld the lower court's discretionary order and found no merit warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLRC/220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a criminal revision case filed by Sri Venkatrama Agro Tech and others challenging the lower court's appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to record cross-examination of a witness (PW1). Though the petitioners objected to the application being filed under an incorrect legal provision, the court held that using the wrong provision alone is insufficient grounds for dismissal when the substantive relief—appointing an Advocate Commissioner—was properly exercised. The court upheld the lower court's discretionary order and found no merit warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case