P SRINIVASA MARUTHI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I — WP/6004/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010104132026

Filing Number

WP/8353/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/6004/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Judge

D Ramesh

Coram

D Ramesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P SRINIVASA MARUTHI

    Adv. GALLA RAMA KOTESWARA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise,

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise,

  4. 4.Sri K. Jitendra Babu,

    Adv. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice before admission in Writ Petition No. 6004 of 2026. The petitioner, P. Srinivasa Maruthi, challenged a seniority-related decision and sought mandamus to restore his original seniority and promotion to Office Superintendent. The court directed notice to the impleaded respondent (Sri K. Jitendra Babu) to show cause within three weeks as to why the petition should not be admitted, and adjourned the case for listing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Admission

    D Ramesh

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6004/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice before admission in Writ Petition No. 6004 of 2026. The petitioner, P. Srinivasa Maruthi, challenged a seniority-related decision and sought mandamus to restore his original seniority and promotion to Office Superintendent. The court directed notice to the impleaded respondent (Sri K. Jitendra Babu) to show cause within three weeks as to why the petition should not be admitted, and adjourned the case for listing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case