YELCHURI YEDUKONDALU vs K. VIJAYANAND, IAS Advocate - G RAJU — CC/895/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10 to 12. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010103172026

Filing Number

CC/8291/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

CC/895/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Nyapathy Vijay

Coram

Nyapathy Vijay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

OS Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10 to 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YELCHURI YEDUKONDALU

    Adv. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA

  2. 2.Guduri Sudeep Raju,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K. VIJAYANAND, IAS Advocate - G RAJU

  2. 2.Sri Kona Sasidhar, I.A.S.,

    Adv. G RAJU

  3. 3.Sri V. Vijay Rama Raju, I.A.S.,

    Adv. G RAJU

  4. 4.Sri P. Raja Babu, I.A.S.,

    Adv. G RAJU

  5. 5.Sri A. Kiran Kumar,

    Adv. G RAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a contempt case filed against state education officials for non-compliance with a prior court order dated 30.08.2025. The court accepted the respondents' submission that the original order had been complied with, as evidenced by a speaking order passed by the District Educational Officer on 22.10.2025, and accordingly dismissed the contempt petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Nyapathy Vijay

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CC/895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a contempt case filed against state education officials for non-compliance with a prior court order dated 30.08.2025. The court accepted the respondents' submission that the original order had been complied with, as evidenced by a speaking order passed by the District Educational Officer on 22.10.2025, and accordingly dismissed the contempt petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case