M/S. MUNNALAL TRANSPORT COMPANY vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX Advocate - Y N VIVEKANANDA — WP/5480/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010097742026
Filing Number
WP/7847/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/5480/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
Coram
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS (MISC.MATTERS) ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. MUNNALAL TRANSPORT COMPANY
Adv. M V J K KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX Advocate - Y N VIVEKANANDA
-
2.Union of India,
Adv. Y N VIVEKANANDA
-
3.. The Branch Manager,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
For Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
07-Apr-2026
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application to amend the cause-title to reflect their second address, finding no reason to reject it. Although the respondents opposed the application, citing inconsistencies in the petitioner's self-description (proprietary concern vs. partner), the court held this would not be determinative of the main petition and reserved the respondents' right to raise such objections in their counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
31-Mar-2026
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Lisa Gill,ninala JayasuryaView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
06-Mar-2026
For Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
03-Mar-2026
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
For Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5480/2026
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application to amend the cause-title to reflect their second address, finding no reason to reject it. Although the respondents opposed the application, citing inconsistencies in the petitioner's self-description (proprietary concern vs. partner), the court held this would not be determinative of the main petition and reserved the respondents' right to raise such objections in their counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts