MAHAMMAD BASHA SHAIK vs K VIJAYANAND IAS Advocate - G RAJU — CC/898/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10 to 12. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010090592026

Filing Number

CC/7256/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

CC/898/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Nyapathy Vijay

Coram

Nyapathy Vijay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

OS Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10 to 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHAMMAD BASHA SHAIK

    Adv. K RAGHU VEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K VIJAYANAND IAS Advocate - G RAJU

  2. 2.Sri Kumar Vishwajeet, I.P.S.

    Adv. G RAJU

  3. 3.Sri Harish Kumar Gupta,

    Adv. G RAJU

  4. 4.Sri S.Hari Krishna, I.P.S.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

    Summary In this contempt case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the petitioner sought punishment of senior police and administrative officials for alleged willful disobedience of a court order dated 21.08.2025. The court accepted the respondents' submission that the original order had been complied with and closed the contempt case with no orders as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Nyapathy Vijay

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CC/898/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this contempt case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the petitioner sought punishment of senior police and administrative officials for alleged willful disobedience of a court order dated 21.08.2025. The court accepted the respondents' submission that the original order had been complied with and closed the contempt case with no orders as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case