YALLA DURGA PRASAD vs Balabhadrapu Veerabhadra Rao, Advocate - V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) — CC/839/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10 to 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010089262025
Filing Number
CC/6600/2025
Filing Date
19-Feb-2025
Registration No
CC/839/2025
Registration Date
25-Mar-2025
Judge
Subba Reddy Satti
Coram
Subba Reddy Satti
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
OS Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YALLA DURGA PRASAD
Adv. VIJAYA KUMAR SATA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balabhadrapu Veerabhadra Rao, Advocate - V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
-
2.Kolli Ratnala Rao,
Adv. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
-
3.KRANTHI CONSTRUCTIONS Civil,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a contempt case against APEPDCL officials, finding no willful disobedience of an interim order dated 12.08.2024. The court held that since the underlying writ petition was dismissed on 02.03.2026, all interim orders automatically merged with the final order and ceased to exist, and the officials could not be held liable for contempt when no specific direction was given to re-engage the petitioner through the outsourcing contractor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
For Admission
Subba Reddy Satti
-
12-Feb-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
For Admission
Subba Reddy Satti
-
22-Jan-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
20-Dec-2025
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
19-Dec-2025
For Admission
Subba Reddy Satti
-
22-Nov-2025
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CC/839/2025
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a contempt case against APEPDCL officials, finding no willful disobedience of an interim order dated 12.08.2024. The court held that since the underlying writ petition was dismissed on 02.03.2026, all interim orders automatically merged with the final order and ceased to exist, and the officials could not be held liable for contempt when no specific direction was given to re-engage the petitioner through the outsourcing contractor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts