Smt. Bolli Geetha Rani, vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II — WP/4741/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226.

CNR: APHC010086282026

Filing Number

WP/6918/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/4741/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

D Ramesh

Coram

D Ramesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

FOOD & AGRL.MARKET COMMITTEE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Bolli Geetha Rani,

    Adv. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II

  2. 2.The Director of Horticulture and Sericulture (H and S)

Case History

  1. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

    Summary: In Writ Petition No. 4741 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the case for eight weeks at the petitioner's request. The Court extended the interim order previously granted, which stays the operation of transfer proceedings against the petitioner (a Deputy Director in the Sericulture Department) and permits her to continue at her present station pending final disposal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Ninala JayasuryaView PDF

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    D RameshView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Admission

    D Ramesh

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4741/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Petition No. 4741 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the case for eight weeks at the petitioner's request. The Court extended the interim order previously granted, which stays the operation of transfer proceedings against the petitioner (a Deputy Director in the Sericulture Department) and permits her to continue at her present station pending final disposal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case