KANHAIYA ALIAS KANHAIYA LAL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SHAILENDRA SINGH — CRLR/8742/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 13th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC016916642025
Filing Number
CRLR/
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRLR/8742/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Judge
Abdul Shahid
Coram
Abdul Shahid
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Against order issuing summons in case of any nature not provided elsewhere ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
13-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANHAIYA ALIAS KANHAIYA LAL
Adv. ARVIND AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SHAILENDRA SINGH
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. SHAILENDRA SINGH
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. SHAILENDRA SINGH
-
4.FIRST INFORMANT
Adv. SHAILENDRA SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Feb-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
13-Feb-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
Case Summary: CRLR 8742/2025 Kanhaiya Alias Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad set aside the trial court's order summoning Kanhaiya as an accused under Section 319 CrPC in a POCSO child sexual abuse case. The court found that witness testimony from the victim and complainant mother attributed no specific criminal role to Kanhaiya, establishing neither mens rea nor mala fide intention required for criminal liability. The trial court was directed to reconsider the Section 319 application afresh in accordance with Supreme Court precedents requiring more than prima facie evidence based solely on trial evidence, not charge-sheet materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/8742/2025
Case Summary: CRLR 8742/2025 Kanhaiya Alias Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad set aside the trial court's order summoning Kanhaiya as an accused under Section 319 CrPC in a POCSO child sexual abuse case. The court found that witness testimony from the victim and complainant mother attributed no specific criminal role to Kanhaiya, establishing neither mens rea nor mala fide intention required for criminal liability. The trial court was directed to reconsider the Section 319 application afresh in accordance with Supreme Court precedents requiring more than prima facie evidence based solely on trial evidence, not charge-sheet materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts