SMT. GYANMATI AND 5 OTHERS vs GOVIND LAL 2 OTHERS — FAFOD/1698/2025

Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC016778712025

Filing Number

FAFOD/

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

FAFOD/1698/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER ( 302100 )

Sub-Category

Compensation under Motor Vehicles Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. GYANMATI AND 5 OTHERS

    Adv. SANDEEP MANIJI BAKHSHI

  2. 2.RAJAN CHAUDHARY (MINOR)

  3. 3.SAJAN CHAUDHARY (MINOR)

  4. 4.NIHARIKA

  5. 5.SURENDRA

  6. 6.RADHIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVIND LAL 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ,KARTIKEYA RAJAWAT 1123

  2. 2.KISHNA

    Adv. KARTIKEYA RAJAWAT

  3. 3.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

    Adv. KARTIKEYA RAJAWAT

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Abdul Shahid

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Piyush Agrawal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    In First Appeal from Order Defective No. 1698 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the case of Smt. Gyanmati and 5 Others versus Govind Lal and 2 Others was adjourned. The court ordered that the case be listed after three weeks along with a fresh Office report, pending service of notice to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAFOD/1698/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In First Appeal from Order Defective No. 1698 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the case of Smt. Gyanmati and 5 Others versus Govind Lal and 2 Others was adjourned. The court ordered that the case be listed after three weeks along with a fresh Office report, pending service of notice to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case