BALWANT YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,YATHARTH NATH PATHAK,PRIYANKA MISHRA — NA528/49971/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016766062025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
NA528/49971/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALWANT YADAV
Adv. VIVEK CHATURVEDI,VIKALP KUMAR RAI,VIKALP KUMAR RAI, ,VIKALP KUMAR RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,YATHARTH NATH PATHAK,PRIYANKA MISHRA
-
2.SMT. MEERA DEVI
Adv. PRIYANKA MISHRA YATHARTH NATH PATHAK
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
12-May-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
22-Apr-2026
For Order
Avnish Saxena
-
19-Mar-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the application filed by Balwant Yadav under Section 528 BNSS, listing it for hearing on 22.04.2026 along with a connected matter. The respondent's counsel challenged the application as misconceived and was permitted to file a counter-affidavit, while parties were directed to exchange affidavits in the interim. The trial court proceedings are ongoing with prosecution evidence being recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
02-Feb-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/49971/2025
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the application filed by Balwant Yadav under Section 528 BNSS, listing it for hearing on 22.04.2026 along with a connected matter. The respondent's counsel challenged the application as misconceived and was permitted to file a counter-affidavit, while parties were directed to exchange affidavits in the interim. The trial court proceedings are ongoing with prosecution evidence being recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts