RAJESH KUMAR RAI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/49818/2025
Case under Asian Development Bank Act Section 7A,60-7A. Disposed: -- on 04th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016730972025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
NA528/49818/2025
Registration Date
09-Dec-2025
Judge
Vikram D Chauhan
Coram
Vikram D Chauhan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C. RELATING TO PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988. ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR RAI
Adv. AMARNATH TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SHYAM BABU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
As Fresh
Vikram D Chauhan
-
27-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Vikram D Chauhan
-
20-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Vikram D Chauhan
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Vikram D Chauhan
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
12-Feb-2026
Samit GopalView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the matter in Rajesh Kumar Rai's application under Section 528 BNSS for one month upon the applicant's counsel's request citing personal difficulties of the lead advocate. The case was listed for fresh hearing on March 27, 2026, with no substantive order passed on the merits of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
19-Jan-2026
Samit GopalView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/49818/2025
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the matter in Rajesh Kumar Rai's application under Section 528 BNSS for one month upon the applicant's counsel's request citing personal difficulties of the lead advocate. The case was listed for fresh hearing on March 27, 2026, with no substantive order passed on the merits of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts