ARIF vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/11639/2025
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC016724492025
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRLA/11639/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARIF
Adv. SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.RENU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
The Allahabad High Court allowed appellant Arif's criminal appeal and set aside the trial court's bail rejection order in an SC/ST Act case involving allegations of rape and enticing away a victim. The court found the lower court erred in rejecting bail, considering the appellant's minor role as alleged driver, contradictions in the victim's statement, and lack of trial conclusion prospects. Arif was granted bail on personal bond and sureties with conditions against tampering with evidence and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
11-Mar-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/11639/2025
The Allahabad High Court allowed appellant Arif's criminal appeal and set aside the trial court's bail rejection order in an SC/ST Act case involving allegations of rape and enticing away a victim. The court found the lower court erred in rejecting bail, considering the appellant's minor role as alleged driver, contradictions in the victim's statement, and lack of trial conclusion prospects. Arif was granted bail on personal bond and sureties with conditions against tampering with evidence and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts