MOHAMMAD ALIAS MOHAMMAD SHAAN vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/42955/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 302,43-302. Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Dec-2025

CNR: UPHC016592382025

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

BAIL/42955/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Ajay Bhanot

Coram

Ajay Bhanot

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 302,43-302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD ALIAS MOHAMMAD SHAAN

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR MAURYA,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA, ,GANESH SHANKER SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Ajay BhanotView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Mohammad Alias Mohammad Shaan in a Section 302 IPC (murder) case, finding that key eyewitnesses failed to identify him as the principal offender and that the trial has progressed at an inordinately slow pace (only 3 of 13 proposed witnesses examined after 6+ years in custody). The court imposed conditions requiring him to furnish personal bond with two sureties, appear for trial, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    —

    Ajay Bhanot

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Ajay BhanotView PDF

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/42955/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Mohammad Alias Mohammad Shaan in a Section 302 IPC (murder) case, finding that key eyewitnesses failed to identify him as the principal offender and that the trial has progressed at an inordinately slow pace (only 3 of 13 proposed witnesses examined after 6+ years in custody). The court imposed conditions requiring him to furnish personal bond with two sureties, appear for trial, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case