MOHAMMAD GULAM GAUS vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/42920/2025
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC016585402025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
29-Nov-2025
Registration No
BAIL/42920/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Judge
Ashutosh Srivastava
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD GULAM GAUS
Adv. RAJEEV UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Mohammad Gulam Gaus in a case involving sections under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and IT Act. The court found that co-accused persons had already been released on bail, the investigating officer lacked credible evidence against the applicant, there were no independent witnesses, and the applicant had no criminal record and posed no flight risk. Bail was granted subject to conditions including executing a personal bond with two sureties, not tampering with evidence, not committing further crimes, not intimidating witnesses, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
19-Feb-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
12-Feb-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
05-Feb-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
29-Jan-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
11-Dec-2025
Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/42920/2025
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Mohammad Gulam Gaus in a case involving sections under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and IT Act. The court found that co-accused persons had already been released on bail, the investigating officer lacked credible evidence against the applicant, there were no independent witnesses, and the applicant had no criminal record and posed no flight risk. Bail was granted subject to conditions including executing a personal bond with two sureties, not tampering with evidence, not committing further crimes, not intimidating witnesses, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts