UDAY PRATAP SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH — NA528/49832/2025
Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016556422025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
NA528/49832/2025
Registration Date
09-Dec-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/S 482 Cr.P.C. against order of Magistrate under section 138 of negotiable instruments Act 1881 ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UDAY PRATAP SHARMA
Adv. LAKSHMAN TRIPATHI,SUMIT KUMAR,SUMIT KUMAR, ,SUMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH
-
2.SINGH RAJLAKSHMI
Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
04-May-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
10-Apr-2026
Deepak VermaView PDF
In Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 49832/2025, the Allahabad High Court adjourned the case for three weeks. The applicant Uday Pratap Sharma was not present, while counsel for the State of U.P. appeared. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
03-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
28-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
20-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
13-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
27-Feb-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
20-Feb-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
13-Feb-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
06-Feb-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
30-Jan-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
21-Jan-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Vikram D ChauhanView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/49832/2025
In Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 49832/2025, the Allahabad High Court adjourned the case for three weeks. The applicant Uday Pratap Sharma was not present, while counsel for the State of U.P. appeared. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts