AZIM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/42576/2025
Disposed: -- on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016539712025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
27-Nov-2025
Registration No
BAIL/42576/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AZIM
Adv. RAMENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI,RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI,RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI, ,RAMA SHANKAR MISHRA,RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.INFORMANT/ COMPLAINANT
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
-
4.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Azim in a case involving charges under Sections 64, 351(2) BNS, 3/4 POCSO Act, and 67 IT Act. The court found merit in the bail application considering the eight-year delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical corroboration, and lack of evidence of viral circulation of indecent material, despite the State's opposition. Azim was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and appearance before trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
20-Mar-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
27-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
27-Jan-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/42576/2025
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to applicant Azim in a case involving charges under Sections 64, 351(2) BNS, 3/4 POCSO Act, and 67 IT Act. The court found merit in the bail application considering the eight-year delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical corroboration, and lack of evidence of viral circulation of indecent material, despite the State's opposition. Azim was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and appearance before trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts