AFZAL AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN — CRLA/11139/2025
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016499132025
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
CRLA/11139/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AFZAL AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. NOOR AHMED,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, ,MO MAKSUD ALAM,RAJEEV MISHRA,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-
2.REHMAN
Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM
-
3.HAROON
Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM
-
4.GULZAR
Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM
-
5.SOBARAN
Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN
-
2.SRI SUNITA
Adv. MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
20-May-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
21-Apr-2026
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
CRLA 11139/2025 – Summary The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance order against Afzal and others. The appellants contended the underlying dispute is civil in nature and the FIR was filed in retaliation after they obtained an interim injunction in their civil suit. The court found merit in the appellants' arguments, noting the prosecution admitted there are no eyewitnesses and all witnesses are interested parties in the civil litigation. The case has been kept in abeyance pending counter-affidavit from the respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
09-Apr-2026
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
31-Mar-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
24-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
17-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
10-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
24-Feb-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
17-Feb-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
03-Feb-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
27-Jan-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/11139/2025
CRLA 11139/2025 – Summary The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance order against Afzal and others. The appellants contended the underlying dispute is civil in nature and the FIR was filed in retaliation after they obtained an interim injunction in their civil suit. The court found merit in the appellants' arguments, noting the prosecution admitted there are no eyewitnesses and all witnesses are interested parties in the civil litigation. The case has been kept in abeyance pending counter-affidavit from the respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts