AFZAL AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN — CRLA/11139/2025

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

Next hearing 20-May-2026

CNR: UPHC016499132025

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRLA/11139/2025

Registration Date

28-Nov-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AFZAL AND 4 OTHERS

    Adv. NOOR AHMED,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, ,MO MAKSUD ALAM,RAJEEV MISHRA,DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.REHMAN

    Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM

  3. 3.HAROON

    Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM

  4. 4.GULZAR

    Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM

  5. 5.SOBARAN

    Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA RAJEEV MISHRA MO MAKSUD ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN

  2. 2.SRI SUNITA

    Adv. MOHD. AKBAR SHAH ALAM KHAN

Case History

  1. 20-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  3. 20-May-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

    CRLA 11139/2025 – Summary The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance order against Afzal and others. The appellants contended the underlying dispute is civil in nature and the FIR was filed in retaliation after they obtained an interim injunction in their civil suit. The court found merit in the appellants' arguments, noting the prosecution admitted there are no eyewitnesses and all witnesses are interested parties in the civil litigation. The case has been kept in abeyance pending counter-affidavit from the respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Abdul Shahid

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  17. 27-Jan-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-Dec-2025

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/11139/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CRLA 11139/2025 – Summary The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance order against Afzal and others. The appellants contended the underlying dispute is civil in nature and the FIR was filed in retaliation after they obtained an interim injunction in their civil suit. The court found merit in the appellants' arguments, noting the prosecution admitted there are no eyewitnesses and all witnesses are interested parties in the civil litigation. The case has been kept in abeyance pending counter-affidavit from the respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case