ROHIT KUMAR GAUTAM AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MATA ACHAL MISHRA,VINAY MISHRA — NA528/47483/2025
Disposed: -- on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016447622025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
NA528/47483/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Judge
Vivek Kumar Singh
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT KUMAR GAUTAM AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. RAY SAHAB YADAV
-
2.SIDDHARTH DEVRAJ JAISWAR ALIAS BADE
-
3.ADARSH ALIAS CHHOTE
-
4.ABHISHEK ALIAS KUNDAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MATA ACHAL MISHRA,VINAY MISHRA
-
2.POOJA DEVI
Adv. VINAY MISHRA MATA ACHAL MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the application filed by Rohit Kumar Gautam and 3 others against the State of U.P. The court provided no detailed reasoning in the judgment, instead directing reference to its order in a related application (No. 47865 of 2025) for the grounds of dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
10-Apr-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
04-Feb-2026
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
19-Dec-2025
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
12-Dec-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/47483/2025
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the application filed by Rohit Kumar Gautam and 3 others against the State of U.P. The court provided no detailed reasoning in the judgment, instead directing reference to its order in a related application (No. 47865 of 2025) for the grounds of dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts