KARAN KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,VIJYETA GUPTA — BAIL/41860/2025
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC016409742025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
21-Nov-2025
Registration No
BAIL/41860/2025
Registration Date
22-Nov-2025
Judge
Sameer Jain
Coram
Sameer Jain
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAN KUMAR
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR MAURYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,VIJYETA GUPTA
-
2.INFORMANT/PARENTS
Adv. VIJYETA GUPTA
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. VIJYETA GUPTA
-
4.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Adv. VIJYETA GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Sameer JainView PDF
Summary of BAIL /41860/2025 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Karan Kumar, accused under BNS sections 65(1), 351(3), 61(2), 115(2) and POCSO Act Section 3/4. The court found the victim (aged 13.5 years) did not name the applicant in her initial statement but mentioned him later, yet made no rape allegations against him—attributing the rape solely to co-accused Akash. Since the applicant is merely the co-accused's friend with no criminal history and jailed since October 19, 2025, the court deemed false implication plausible. Bail was granted on furnishing personal bond and sureties, with conditions restricting witness tampering and criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
11-Mar-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/41860/2025
Summary of BAIL /41860/2025 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Karan Kumar, accused under BNS sections 65(1), 351(3), 61(2), 115(2) and POCSO Act Section 3/4. The court found the victim (aged 13.5 years) did not name the applicant in her initial statement but mentioned him later, yet made no rape allegations against him—attributing the rape solely to co-accused Akash. Since the applicant is merely the co-accused's friend with no criminal history and jailed since October 19, 2025, the court deemed false implication plausible. Bail was granted on furnishing personal bond and sureties, with conditions restricting witness tampering and criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts