BABU LAL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — C372D/181/2024
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506(2),43-506(2). Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC016328142024
Filing Number
C372D/250612/2024
Filing Date
02-Dec-2024
Registration No
C372D/181/2024
Registration Date
05-Dec-2024
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL U/s 372 Cr.P.C. ( 400800 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Appeal U/s 372 Cr.P.C. (Single Bench) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABU LAL
Adv. RAJANI KANT MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.ASHOK KUMAR
-
3.KAUSHALYA
-
4.PRADEEP KUMAR
-
5.SUSHILA DEVI
-
6.VIJAY KUMAR
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
20-May-2026
As Fresh
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
13-May-2026
As Fresh
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
21-Apr-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
The case C372D/181/2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad was adjourned on April 21, 2026. The court noted that respondent no. 6 had died and that respondents no. 2-5 were absent despite service of notice. The case was listed for hearing on admission on May 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
13-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
25-Mar-2026
Tej Pratap TiwariView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
18-Feb-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
15-Jan-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
14-Jan-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
06-Nov-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
06-Aug-2025
Manoj BajajView PDF
-
10-Feb-2025
—
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
-
17-Dec-2024
Nalin Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. C372D/181/2024
The case C372D/181/2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad was adjourned on April 21, 2026. The court noted that respondent no. 6 had died and that respondents no. 2-5 were absent despite service of notice. The case was listed for hearing on admission on May 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts