LOKESH PIPPAL vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SAURABH DWIVEDI,KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI — CRLA/10879/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: UPHC016299242025

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRLA/10879/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOKESH PIPPAL

    Adv. ALOK SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SAURABH DWIVEDI,KAMLESH KUMAR DWIVEDI

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 10879 of 2025 filed by Lokesh Pippal against the State of U.P. The case has been listed for hearing on 28.04.2026 as per the request of counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Raj Beer Singh

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Raj Beer Singh

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Raj Beer Singh

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Raj Beer Singh

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Raj Beer Singh

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/10879/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 10879 of 2025 filed by Lokesh Pippal against the State of U.P. The case has been listed for hearing on 28.04.2026 as per the request of counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case