RAMYAD @ RAMYAD NISHAD AND 3 OTHERS vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR AND 10 OTHERS — WRIB/4778/2025
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC016255572025
Filing Number
WRIB/
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
WRIB/4778/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Judge
Dinesh Pathak
Coram
Dinesh Pathak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )
Sub-Category
( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMYAD @ RAMYAD NISHAD AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ANJUM VISHAKARMA,RAHUL SAXENA,RAHUL SAXENA, ,RAHUL SAXENA
-
2.RAM ASHREY
Adv. RAHUL SAXENA
-
3.RAM AWADH
Adv. RAHUL SAXENA
-
4.SANDEEP
Adv. RAHUL SAXENA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR AND 10 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION, SADAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.NAND LAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.SANT LAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.HRIDYA NARAYAN
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.SHYAM LAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.SAHAB LAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
8.LALLAN
Adv. C.S.C.
-
9.LALMANI
Adv. C.S.C.
-
10.JHAGRU
Adv. C.S.C.
-
11.BHUKHA
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Dinesh PathakView PDF
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Sadar, Jaunpur to decide the pending appeal (No. 4713) under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act strictly according to law within three months, with reasoned orders and proper hearing to both parties without unnecessary adjournments. No observations were made on the merits, and the court made no separate order on the status-quo request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Kshitij Shailendra
-
19-Jan-2026
Kshitij ShailendraView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
For Admission
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2025
Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WRIB/4778/2025
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Sadar, Jaunpur to decide the pending appeal (No. 4713) under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act strictly according to law within three months, with reasoned orders and proper hearing to both parties without unnecessary adjournments. No observations were made on the merits, and the court made no separate order on the status-quo request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts