RAVINDRA SINGH ALIAS CHUNNU vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,RAM LAKHAN DEOBANSHI — BAIL/41205/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34. Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC016221672025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
BAIL/41205/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA SINGH ALIAS CHUNNU
Adv. DIWAKAR SHUKLA,KULDIP SINGH YADAV,KULDIP SINGH YADAV, ,AJAY SINGH YADAV,KULDIP SINGH YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,RAM LAKHAN DEOBANSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad rejected Ravindra Singh's second bail application in a case involving serious charges including rioting, attempted murder, and murder under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, and 302. The court found that the trial is at its conclusive stage with ten witnesses already examined, and relying on Supreme Court precedent that bail should not normally be granted after charge is framed or when trial is nearing completion, it denied the bail despite the applicant's one-year-ten-month incarceration. However, the court directed expeditious trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
12-Feb-2026
Ajay BhanotView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
29-Jan-2026
Ajay BhanotView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
11-Dec-2025
Ajay BhanotView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/41205/2025
The High Court of Allahabad rejected Ravindra Singh's second bail application in a case involving serious charges including rioting, attempted murder, and murder under IPC Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, and 302. The court found that the trial is at its conclusive stage with ten witnesses already examined, and relying on Supreme Court precedent that bail should not normally be granted after charge is framed or when trial is nearing completion, it denied the bail despite the applicant's one-year-ten-month incarceration. However, the court directed expeditious trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts