SUNEETA vs State of UP Advocate - G.A., ,RANJEET SINGH — CRLA/10780/2024
Case under Andhra State Act Section 498-A,43-498-A. Disposed: -- on 20th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC015659822024
Filing Number
CRLA/223718/2024
Filing Date
23-Oct-2024
Registration No
CRLA/10780/2024
Registration Date
25-Oct-2024
Judge
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
Coram
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter where offence U/s 304B I.P.C. is involved (SB) ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNEETA
Adv. SHIV SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of UP Advocate - G.A., ,RANJEET SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Raj Beer Singh
-
20-Mar-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad allowed Suneeta's appeal and set aside her conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, after the Juvenile Justice Board determined she was below 18 years old at the time of the incident. The court remitted the case to the Juvenile Justice Board for a fresh inquiry/trial in accordance with the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
15-Jan-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
18-Nov-2025
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
27-Oct-2025
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
—
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
-
22-Sep-2025
Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
21-Jul-2025
Manoj BajajView PDF
-
21-Jul-2025
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
14-Jul-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
20-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2024
Rajeev MisraView PDF
-
23-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/10780/2024
The High Court of Allahabad allowed Suneeta's appeal and set aside her conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, after the Juvenile Justice Board determined she was below 18 years old at the time of the incident. The court remitted the case to the Juvenile Justice Board for a fresh inquiry/trial in accordance with the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts