ADITYA MAURYA ALIAS VIKAS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/6659/2025
Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Disposed: -- on 12th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC015612082025
Filing Number
CRLR/
Filing Date
14-Oct-2025
Registration No
CRLR/6659/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Judge
Madan Pal Singh
Coram
Madan Pal Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Revision against in any matter in 125 Cr. P. C. (Except order of Interim Maintenance ) ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ADITYA MAURYA ALIAS VIKAS
Adv. KUMAR ANKIT SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.MONIKA MAURYA
-
3.TEJAS MAURYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
16-Feb-2026
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal revision petition filed by Aditya Maurya (Alias Vikas) against the State of U.P. and two others to March 12, 2026, as notices to opposite parties 2 and 3 remain unserved. No substantive decision on merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
06-Jan-2026
Madan Pal SinghView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
16-Dec-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
09-Dec-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
02-Dec-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
25-Nov-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
04-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/6659/2025
This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The Allahabad High Court adjourned the criminal revision petition filed by Aditya Maurya (Alias Vikas) against the State of U.P. and two others to March 12, 2026, as notices to opposite parties 2 and 3 remain unserved. No substantive decision on merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts