VIJENDRA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., JAYA AGRAHARI — BAIL/35751/2025
Disposed: -- on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: UPHC015445732025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
08-Oct-2025
Registration No
BAIL/35751/2025
Registration Date
10-Oct-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJENDRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. ASHUTOSH KUMAR MISHRA,SHIV PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN,SHIV PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN, ,S.P.S. CHAUHAN
-
2.WALA DEVI
Adv. SHIV PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., JAYA AGRAHARI
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. JAYA AGRAHARI
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. JAYA AGRAHARI
-
4.FIRST INFORMANT
Adv. JAYA AGRAHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
07-Apr-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The Allahabad High Court adjourned the bail application of Vijendra and another to April 22, 2026, for filing a supplementary affidavit detailing the applicants' criminal history. No substantive bail decision was rendered on the merits at this hearing, as the counsel for the informant was absent and the matter was postponed as requested by the applicants' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
24-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
27-Jan-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
15-Jan-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
19-Nov-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/35751/2025
The Allahabad High Court adjourned the bail application of Vijendra and another to April 22, 2026, for filing a supplementary affidavit detailing the applicants' criminal history. No substantive bail decision was rendered on the merits at this hearing, as the counsel for the informant was absent and the matter was postponed as requested by the applicants' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts