RAHUL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY — BAIL/35357/2025
Disposed: -- on 19th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC015390922025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
07-Oct-2025
Registration No
BAIL/35357/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Judge
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL
Adv. P.K. SINGH,ASHISH KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR, ,ASHISH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY
-
2.INFORMANT/ VICTIM
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY
-
4.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Feb-2026
For Order
Vivek Varma
-
11-Feb-2026
Vivek VarmaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court adjourned Rahul's bail application (No. 35357/2025) as the applicant's counsel failed to appear on February 11, 2026. The court rescheduled the case for the additional cause list on February 19, 2026, clarifying it shall not be treated as tied up or part-heard before the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
16-Jan-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
08-Jan-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
18-Dec-2025
—
Vivek Varma
-
11-Dec-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
04-Dec-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
28-Oct-2025
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/35357/2025
The Allahabad High Court adjourned Rahul's bail application (No. 35357/2025) as the applicant's counsel failed to appear on February 11, 2026. The court rescheduled the case for the additional cause list on February 19, 2026, clarifying it shall not be treated as tied up or part-heard before the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts