RAMCHANDRA vs State of U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA — CRLR/5366/2024

Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Disposed: -- on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Oct-2024

CNR: UPHC015319572024

Filing Number

CRLR/208460/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

CRLR/5366/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Judge

Achal Sachdev

Coram

Achal Sachdev

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Revision against in any matter in 125 Cr. P. C. (Except order of Interim Maintenance ) ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 125,10-125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA

    Adv. PAWANKUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

  2. 2.SMT. SUSHILA DEVI

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Aug-2026

    Achal Sachdev

  3. 05-May-2026

    Achal SachdevView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Ramchandra's criminal revision challenging the trial court's maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court found the trial court's findings were not perverse, rejecting the revisionist's claim of financial inability, noting he possessed sufficient resources including pension, agricultural land, and property, and had deliberately transferred assets to deprive his second wife. The maintenance award of Rs. 2,000/month from application date and Rs. 6,000/month from order date was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Garima Prashad

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Garima PrashadView PDF

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Harvir Singh

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Harvir SinghView PDF

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Harvir Singh

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Harvir SinghView PDF

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Harvir Singh

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Harvir Singh

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Harvir Singh

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Madan Pal Singh

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Madan Pal SinghView PDF

  19. 16-Oct-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  21. 25-Sep-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  22. 18-Sep-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  23. 11-Sep-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  24. 03-Sep-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  25. 27-Aug-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  26. 21-Aug-2025

    Madan Pal Singh

  27. 13-Aug-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  28. 06-Aug-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  29. 30-Jul-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  30. 23-Jul-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  31. 16-Jul-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  32. 09-Jul-2025

    As Fresh

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  33. 02-Jun-2025

    Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF

  34. 02-Jun-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  35. 26-May-2025

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  36. 19-May-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  37. 14-May-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  38. 06-May-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  39. 29-Apr-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  40. 22-Apr-2025

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  41. 15-Apr-2025

    As Fresh

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  42. 11-Feb-2025

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  43. 30-Jan-2025

    Samit Gopal

  44. 04-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/5366/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Ramchandra's criminal revision challenging the trial court's maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court found the trial court's findings were not perverse, rejecting the revisionist's claim of financial inability, noting he possessed sufficient resources including pension, agricultural land, and property, and had deliberately transferred assets to deprive his second wife. The maintenance award of Rs. 2,000/month from application date and Rs. 6,000/month from order date was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case