AKSHAY vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVA — NA528/38874/2025
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC015279442025
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Registration No
NA528/38874/2025
Registration Date
27-Sep-2025
Judge
Sanjiv Kumar
Coram
Sanjiv Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKSHAY
Adv. PADMAKER PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVA
-
2.RAKESH DEVI
Adv. SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Sanjiv KumarView PDF
Case Summary: The Allahabad High Court allowed Akshay's application under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1862 of 2025) arising from FIR Crime No. 279 of 2024 under Sections 318(4), 332(C), and 351(2) BNSS, Jhinjhana Police Station, District Shamli. The court found that the parties had executed and the Trial Court verified a compromise settlement on 25.02.2026, and held that the court's inherent power could be exercised to terminate proceedings where a private dispute is mutually settled with no wider social impact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
04-Feb-2026
Sanjiv KumarView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
25-Nov-2025
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
—
Kshitij Shailendra
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
04-Nov-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
28-Oct-2025
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/38874/2025
Case Summary: The Allahabad High Court allowed Akshay's application under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1862 of 2025) arising from FIR Crime No. 279 of 2024 under Sections 318(4), 332(C), and 351(2) BNSS, Jhinjhana Police Station, District Shamli. The court found that the parties had executed and the Trial Court verified a compromise settlement on 25.02.2026, and held that the court's inherent power could be exercised to terminate proceedings where a private dispute is mutually settled with no wider social impact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts