RAMBABU YADAV AND 2 OTHERS vs MOHAN SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER — FAFOD/1637/2025

Next hearing: 17th February 2026.

Next hearing 17-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC015132072025

Filing Number

FAFOD/

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

FAFOD/1637/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER ( 302100 )

Sub-Category

Compensation under Motor Vehicles Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMBABU YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR OJHA,VINAY KUMAR DWIVEDI,VINAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ,VINAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

  2. 2.DRAUPADI YADAV

    Adv. VINAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

  3. 3.NEELU YADAV

    Adv. VINAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.L. & T. INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 601-602, 6TH FLOOR, TRADE CENTER, BANDRA CURLA, COMPLEX

Case History

  1. 17-Feb-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Feb-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (FAFOD No. 1637/2025) directed the appellants (Rambabu Yadav and 2 others) to take fresh steps in their appeal against Mohan Singh Yadav and another. The court permitted service of documents through dasti (hand delivery) in addition to normal service modes, with the appellants required to file an affidavit of service by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAFOD/1637/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (FAFOD No. 1637/2025) directed the appellants (Rambabu Yadav and 2 others) to take fresh steps in their appeal against Mohan Singh Yadav and another. The court permitted service of documents through dasti (hand delivery) in addition to normal service modes, with the appellants required to file an affidavit of service by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case