MOHD. AMAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,TRIPURESH SINGH,GAURAV TIWARI,DHIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA — CRLR/5905/2025
Case under Andhra State Act Section 323,43-323. Disposed: -- on 10th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC015104142025
Filing Number
CRLR/
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
CRLR/5905/2025
Registration Date
22-Sep-2025
Judge
Abdul Shahid
Coram
Abdul Shahid
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
10-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD. AMAN
Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR DUBEY,VINAY KUMAR SINGH,VINAY KUMAR SINGH, ,VINAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,TRIPURESH SINGH,GAURAV TIWARI,DHIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA
-
2.SALMA TASLEEM
Adv. DHIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA GAURAV TIWARI TRIPURESH SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Feb-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
10-Feb-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
The Allahabad High Court allowed Mohd. Aman's criminal revision, finding major inconsistencies between the FIR, injury evidence, and medical reports that rendered the trial court's rejection of his discharge application legally unsustainable. The court noted discrepancies regarding weapon types, injury severity, and timeline, and directed the trial court to reconsider his discharge application afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
19-Jan-2026
Chawan PrakashView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
19-Dec-2025
—
Abdul Shahid
-
12-Dec-2025
—
Lakshmi Kant Shukla
-
05-Dec-2025
—
Abdul Shahid
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Nalin Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/5905/2025
The Allahabad High Court allowed Mohd. Aman's criminal revision, finding major inconsistencies between the FIR, injury evidence, and medical reports that rendered the trial court's rejection of his discharge application legally unsustainable. The court noted discrepancies regarding weapon types, injury severity, and timeline, and directed the trial court to reconsider his discharge application afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts