SONU vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/9206/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 10th February 2026.

Next hearing 10-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC014970102025

Filing Number

CRLAD/

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRLA/9206/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU

    Adv. AGNI PAL SINGH,PRATIMA SINGH,PRATIMA SINGH, ,PRATIMA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. 10-Feb-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 9206/2025 The High Court at Allahabad modified its previous bail order dated 15.12.2025 granted to appellant Sonu. The court removed the condition requiring one surety to be a family member, as the appellant could not fulfill this requirement and remained imprisoned. Sonu is now eligible for release upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    —

    Tarun Saxena

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    —

    Harvir Singh

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/9206/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 9206/2025 The High Court at Allahabad modified its previous bail order dated 15.12.2025 granted to appellant Sonu. The court removed the condition requiring one surety to be a family member, as the appellant could not fulfill this requirement and remained imprisoned. Sonu is now eligible for release upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case