JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAIKA vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/31833/2025
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC014860382025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
10-Sep-2025
Registration No
BAIL/31833/2025
Registration Date
12-Sep-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAIKA
Adv. AJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Jai Kumar Alias Jaika in Crime No. 215 of 2024 (BNS Sections 103(1), 61(2), 111(2)(1)), finding that he was not named in the FIR and lacked cogent evidence against him—his involvement surfaced only in a co-accused's confessional statement. The court held that multiple pending cases alone cannot justify bail denial and released him on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
11-Mar-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
19-Jan-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
-
19-Dec-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
12-Dec-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
27-Nov-2025
Krishan PahalView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
20-Nov-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
14-Nov-2025
—
Vivek Varma
-
07-Nov-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
30-Oct-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
15-Oct-2025
Krishan PahalView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
—
Krishan Pahal
-
08-Oct-2025
—
Samit Gopal
-
24-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/31833/2025
The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Jai Kumar Alias Jaika in Crime No. 215 of 2024 (BNS Sections 103(1), 61(2), 111(2)(1)), finding that he was not named in the FIR and lacked cogent evidence against him—his involvement surfaced only in a co-accused's confessional statement. The court held that multiple pending cases alone cannot justify bail denial and released him on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts