ZABIR vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SATISH CHANDRA TIWARI — BAIL/31077/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34. Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Sep-2025

CNR: UPHC014728352025

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

BAIL/31077/2025

Registration Date

06-Sep-2025

Judge

Ajay Bhanot

Coram

Ajay Bhanot

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34
Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 4,4-4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ZABIR

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR CHAHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,SATISH CHANDRA TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Ajay BhanotView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed Zabir's bail application in a murder case (Crime No. 34/2024, Sections 302/34 IPC and 4/25 Arms Act). The court found that prosecution evidence had concluded, the applicant cooperated with investigations, posed no flight risk or witness-tampering threat, and continued detention would impede his defense preparation. Zabir was granted bail with conditions including personal bond, two sureties, non-interference with evidence/witnesses, and mandatory trial court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    —

    Ajay Bhanot

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Ajay BhanotView PDF

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    —

    Ajay Bhanot

  6. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    Ajay BhanotView PDF

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/31077/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed Zabir's bail application in a murder case (Crime No. 34/2024, Sections 302/34 IPC and 4/25 Arms Act). The court found that prosecution evidence had concluded, the applicant cooperated with investigations, posed no flight risk or witness-tampering threat, and continued detention would impede his defense preparation. Zabir was granted bail with conditions including personal bond, two sureties, non-interference with evidence/witnesses, and mandatory trial court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case