RAMESHCHANDRA vs State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLRD/1486/2024
Case under Advocates Act Section 128,10-128. Disposed: -- on 16th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC014566562024
Filing Number
CRLRD/178996/2024
Filing Date
29-Aug-2024
Registration No
CRLRD/1486/2024
Registration Date
11-Sep-2024
Judge
Harvir Singh
Coram
Harvir Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Revision against in any matter in 128 Cr.P.C. ( 41 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESHCHANDRA
Adv. YASHWANT PRATAP SINGH,DINESH KUMAR PATEL,DINESH KUMAR PATEL, ,ANURAG YADAV,RAY SAHAB YADAV,DINESH KUMAR PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.KIRAN DEVI
-
3.RISHU KUMAR
-
4.SHREYA KUMARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
16-Mar-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
Summary of CRLRD 1486/2024 The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rameshchandra's delay condonation application and the underlying criminal revision petition. The court found that Rameshchandra (the revisionist-husband) had willfully and deliberately avoided participating in the Family Court proceedings—he failed to appear, obtained ex-parte orders that were recalled, then failed to appear again despite filing a reply. When the court previously ordered him to file certified copies of the impugned orders, he failed to comply, and the court held him responsible for his default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
27-Feb-2026
—
Jai Krishna Upadhyay
-
20-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
13-Feb-2026
—
Jai Krishna Upadhyay
-
06-Feb-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
30-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
21-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
13-Jan-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
06-Jan-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
16-Dec-2025
—
Satya Veer Singh
-
08-Dec-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
28-Nov-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
20-Nov-2025
—
Achal Sachdev
-
14-Nov-2025
—
Tarun Saxena
-
07-Nov-2025
—
Achal Sachdev
-
30-Oct-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
16-Oct-2025
—
Abdul Shahid
-
11-Sep-2025
Abdul ShahidView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
—
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
-
03-Sep-2025
Pramod Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
27-Aug-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
21-Aug-2025
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
13-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
05-Aug-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
29-Jul-2025
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
22-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
15-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
08-Jul-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
02-Jun-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
26-May-2025
—
Nand Prabha Shukla
-
19-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
14-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
06-May-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
29-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
18-Apr-2025
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
03-Apr-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
19-Mar-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
03-Mar-2025
—
Vikas Budhwar
-
14-Feb-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
27-Jan-2025
—
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
-
20-Jan-2025
—
Vipin Chandra Dixit
-
05-Dec-2024
Vipin Chandra DixitView PDF
-
05-Dec-2024
—
Sanjay Kumar Singh
-
28-Nov-2024
—
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
-
21-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
13-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
05-Nov-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
23-Oct-2024
—
Manjive Shukla
-
16-Oct-2024
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
30-Sep-2024
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
23-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRLRD/1486/2024
Summary of CRLRD 1486/2024 The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rameshchandra's delay condonation application and the underlying criminal revision petition. The court found that Rameshchandra (the revisionist-husband) had willfully and deliberately avoided participating in the Family Court proceedings—he failed to appear, obtained ex-parte orders that were recalled, then failed to appear again despite filing a reply. When the court previously ordered him to file certified copies of the impugned orders, he failed to comply, and the court held him responsible for his default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts