PUSHP RAJ SINGH ALIAS GUDDU vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAVINDRA KUMAR MISHRA,SATWIK TRIPATHI,ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA,RAHUL KUMAR SHUKLA — NA528/34334/2025

Disposed: -- on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Sep-2025

CNR: UPHC014530122025

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

27-Aug-2025

Registration No

NA528/34334/2025

Registration Date

04-Sep-2025

Judge

Vivek Kumar Singh

Coram

Vivek Kumar Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHP RAJ SINGH ALIAS GUDDU

    Adv. SAURABH RAJ SRIVASTAVA,SANJAY KUMAR SINGH,SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, ,PRASHANT SINGH,SANJAY KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAVINDRA KUMAR MISHRA,SATWIK TRIPATHI,ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA,RAHUL KUMAR SHUKLA

  2. 2.COMPLAINANT

    Adv. RAHUL KUMAR SHUKLA ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA SATWIK TRIPATHI RAVINDRA KUMAR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    As Fresh

    Deepak Verma

  3. 15-May-2026

    As Fresh

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/34334/2025 The High Court at Allahabad heard an application by Pushp Raj Singh regarding inconsistencies in the charge sheet. While the investigating officer omitted Section 70(2) BNS (rape) from the original charge sheet, the trial court added this serious charge during cognizance. The court noted the investigating officer's counter-affidavit admitting that Section 70(2) BNS offense was established but wasn't included in the original chargesheet. The court ordered the investigating officer to appear personally on 15.05.2026 to explain his conduct and the discrepancy between investigation findings and chargesheet submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Chawan PrakashView PDF

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    As Fresh

    Tarun Saxena

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Tarun SaxenaView PDF

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    As Fresh

    Tarun Saxena

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  15. 16-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  17. 18-Dec-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  19. 04-Dec-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  20. 27-Nov-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  22. 14-Nov-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    —

    Tej Pratap Tiwari

  24. 30-Oct-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  25. 16-Oct-2025

    —

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  26. 09-Oct-2025

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  27. 25-Sep-2025

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  28. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 10-Sep-2025

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  30. 27-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/34334/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/34334/2025 The High Court at Allahabad heard an application by Pushp Raj Singh regarding inconsistencies in the charge sheet. While the investigating officer omitted Section 70(2) BNS (rape) from the original charge sheet, the trial court added this serious charge during cognizance. The court noted the investigating officer's counter-affidavit admitting that Section 70(2) BNS offense was established but wasn't included in the original chargesheet. The court ordered the investigating officer to appear personally on 15.05.2026 to explain his conduct and the discrepancy between investigation findings and chargesheet submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case