VIPIN vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/29266/2025
Disposed: -- on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: UPHC014352292025
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
BAIL/29266/2025
Registration Date
21-Aug-2025
Judge
Krishan Pahal
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPIN
Adv. PRASHANT SINGH,SAURABH SACHAN,SAURABH SACHAN, ,SAURABH SACHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
-
3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
-
4.FIRST INFORMANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Vipin in a POCSO Act case, finding that the victim's statement indicated consent, there was no medical corroboration, and no rape allegation was made against him. The court ordered his release on personal bond and two sureties, with conditions against tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses, while making no determination on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
08-Apr-2026
Krishan PahalView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
24-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
22-Jan-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
07-Jan-2026
—
Vivek Varma
-
11-Dec-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
28-Nov-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
15-Nov-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
03-Nov-2025
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Samit GopalView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/29266/2025
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Vipin in a POCSO Act case, finding that the victim's statement indicated consent, there was no medical corroboration, and no rape allegation was made against him. The court ordered his release on personal bond and two sureties, with conditions against tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses, while making no determination on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts