MAHENDRA SHARMA ALIAS MANU vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/51902/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 406,43-406. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: UPHC014279052025

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

18-Aug-2025

Registration No

NA528/51902/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 406,43-406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA SHARMA ALIAS MANU

    Adv. DEEPAK SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SONI RANI

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    —

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Summary: The Allahabad High Court admitted Mahendra Sharma's Section 528 BNSS petition challenging criminal proceedings (Case No. 126/2025) arising from an alleged bank loan fraud case. Finding the matter prima facie requires consideration, the court stayed further proceedings against the applicant and directed both the State and the Bank of Baroda to file counter-affidavits within two weeks, with the case listed after eight weeks for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/51902/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Allahabad High Court admitted Mahendra Sharma's Section 528 BNSS petition challenging criminal proceedings (Case No. 126/2025) arising from an alleged bank loan fraud case. Finding the matter prima facie requires consideration, the court stayed further proceedings against the applicant and directed both the State and the Bank of Baroda to file counter-affidavits within two weeks, with the case listed after eight weeks for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case