RAKESH CHANDRA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PRADEEP KUMAR BHARDWAJ — CRLR/4048/2024

Case under Advocates Act Section 156(3),10-156(3). Disposed: -- on 16th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Aug-2024

CNR: UPHC014128232024

Filing Number

CRLR/161768/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

CRLR/4048/2024

Registration Date

07-Aug-2024

Judge

Abdul Shahid

Coram

Abdul Shahid

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AGAINST any matter in 156(3) Cr.P.C. ( 32 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

16-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 156(3),10-156(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH CHANDRA

    Adv. RAKESH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PRADEEP KUMAR BHARDWAJ

  2. 2.ANJU KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR BHARDWAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2026

    Abdul Shahid

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rakesh Chandra's criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application. The court upheld the trial court's decision, finding that since an FIR was already lodged and a final investigation report submitted, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is to file a protest petition against the final report, not seek further investigation through Section 156(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Kshitij Shailendra

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Kshitij ShailendraView PDF

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Divesh Chandra Samant

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Divesh Chandra SamantView PDF

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Chawan Prakash

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    Chawan PrakashView PDF

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Harvir Singh

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Harvir Singh

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Harvir Singh

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    Sameer Jain

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  17. 01-Sep-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  18. 25-Aug-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  19. 19-Aug-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  21. 04-Aug-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  22. 28-Jul-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  23. 21-Jul-2025

    As Fresh

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  24. 03-Jun-2025

    Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF

  25. 03-Jun-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  26. 27-May-2025

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  27. 23-Apr-2025

    Mohd. Azhar Husain IdrisiView PDF

  28. 23-Apr-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  29. 16-Apr-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  30. 08-Apr-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  31. 02-Apr-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  32. 25-Mar-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  33. 18-Mar-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  34. 07-Mar-2025

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  35. 28-Feb-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  36. 20-Feb-2025

    Rajesh Singh Chauhan

  37. 13-Feb-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  38. 05-Feb-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  39. 27-Jan-2025

    Manjive Shukla

  40. 20-Jan-2025

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  41. 17-Dec-2024

    Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF

  42. 17-Dec-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  43. 10-Dec-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  44. 03-Dec-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  45. 26-Nov-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  46. 19-Nov-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  47. 11-Nov-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  48. 28-Oct-2024

    Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

  49. 21-Oct-2024

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  50. 04-Oct-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  51. 26-Sep-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  52. 20-Sep-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  53. 12-Sep-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  54. 05-Sep-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  55. 30-Aug-2024

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

  56. 22-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/4048/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Rakesh Chandra's criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application. The court upheld the trial court's decision, finding that since an FIR was already lodged and a final investigation report submitted, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is to file a protest petition against the final report, not seek further investigation through Section 156(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case